have approached this Court with this revision to struck off the plaint in the above said suit from the file of the District Munsif, Tambaram ... revision invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India to struck off the plaint.
5. It is revealed from the grounds of revision that previously
India to prevent abuse of process of Court
and therefore the plaint was struck off the file.
31. In the decision fourth cited supra
with the plea of res judicata or the statement or plaint may be struck out on the ground that the action is frivolous and vexation
with the plea of res judicata or the statement or plaint may be struck out on the ground that the action is frivolous and vexatious ... possible to strike out the plaint on the ground of issue estoppel, the action can be struck out as an abuse of the process
with the plea of res judicata or the statement or plaint may be struck out on the ground that the action is frivolous and vexatious ... possible to strike out the plaint on the ground of issue estoppel, the action can be struck out as an abuse of the process
filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to struck off the plaint in O.S.No.128 of 2013 on the file
filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to struck off the plaint in O.S.No.128 of 2013 on the file
respondent/proposed 5th defendant alone has claimed that he had purchased the plaint 'B' Schedule property from the 8th respondent ... doctrine of res judicata.
70. We have struck a balance between the submissions made on behalf both sides and ultimately found that as observed
Court will take into consideration the Plaint and the Plaint alone. The challenge to the Plaint and its affirmation by the Petitioners/Defendants ... purpose of rejecting the Plaint. A jurisdiction to dismiss the suit has to be distinguished from jurisdiction to reject the Plaint. The mandatory provision contained
order dated 06.12.1998);
iii.For recovery of costs.
5. As per the plaint 'B' schedule, the suit property has been described as under ... suit in O.S.No.9869 of 1990 shall be struck off without any further reference to this Court. The trial Court is directed