Antulay v. Srinivas Nayak ( 1984) 2 SCC 500, Subramanian Swamy
v. Manmohan Singh (2012) 3 SCC 64, the learned Senior Counsel Shri
Grover has submitted ... such statutory provision."
32. These principles have been reiterated in Subramanian Swamy
(2012) 3 SCC 64 (supra) in following words:
"The right
decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Subramanian Swamy vs Manmohan Singh and another reported in (2012) 3 Supreme Court Cases ... taken cognizance of the offence."
6. In the case of Subramanian Swamy (supra) the time limit for three months for grant of sanction
placed heavy reliance on a recent judgment of this Court in
Subramanian Swamy 's case wherein there is a copious discussion
recent Constitution Bench Judgment decision of this Court in
Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India [W.P (Crl.) No.184 of
2014], this Court held
pave the path of
anarchism."
21. Recently, in Dr. Subramanian Swamy v.
.
Director, CBI( 2014) 8 SCC 682, the
Constitution Bench while declaring Section
express statutory provision."
These principles have been reiterated in Subramanian Swamy Vs. Manmohan Singh , (2012) 3 SCC 64, in following words:
"The right ... balance in the Rule of law."
In the case of Subramanian Swamy Vs. Raju , (2013) 10 SCC 465, the petitioner, in a public interest
public servant is in the public interest and
in Subramanian Swamy Vs. Manmohan Singh -it was held that the provisions
dealing with sanction
Supreme Court in the case of
Subramanian Swamy vs. Manmohan Singh and another , reported in
.
(2012) 3 SCC 64 have held that though term
CrPC ) has been upheld in the case of
ARORA
Date: 2016.07.16
Subramanian Swamy vs. Union of India, Ministry
State of Bihar & Ors., [1987] 1 SCC 288; of
Subramanian Swamy v. Manmohan Singh & Anr. ,
[2012] 3 SCC 64 and in case
