order dated 8th June, 1987 was passed placing the
petitioner under suspension with immediate effect pending
enquiry into alleged misconduct.
WP (C) No.2646/1990 ... against S.I. A. K. Nigam D-5102 (CISF No.
8444041) under suspension, that while he was on
duty in immigration in shift
point involved in the writ
petition was whether during the period of suspension, an
(13 of 19) [CW-1128/2001]
employee is required to mark ... case, he is
absent from duty during the period of suspension for certain days,
does it fall under the misconduct for the purpose of disciplinary
interim prohibitory order passed against a professional cannot be equated to the suspension of a Government servant or a worker.
12. However, the State ... competence or jurisdiction; and
(c) that in any case, the order of suspension passed by the Chairman of the State Bar Council has been ratified
aside the same;
(AB) Quash and set aside the impugned common suspension
order, dated 04.04.2002 (at Annexure 'VI A'), and the
common charge ... Annexure 'VI
B'), and further declare that the period of suspension be
treated as period spent on duty;
(B) directing the respondents
Section 23 of the Act clearly provides that any action such
as suspension of registration or non-renewal of the certificate can only be taken ... State
medical council concerned for taking necessary action including the suspension of
the registration if 'charges are framed' by the Court till
appears
that in pursuance of the proposal sent by the Management for suspension
of the Respondent No.1, the Education Inspector granted approval for
suspension ... suspend the Respondent No.1 from the date of service of
suspension letter. It was further resolved to serve the suspension letter on
him upon
without obtaining the prior permission of the respondent no.4 during the suspension period.
5. The contention of the appellants is that they could have ... stayed at the headquarters during the suspension period under the unavoidable circumstances inasmuch as an First Information Report (F.I.R.) having been lodged against
Petitioner from his service where it has also been
indicated that the suspension period from 12.7.1998 till 22.04.1999 will
be treated as non-duty ... Since the order of punishment or removal, and further, the suspension
period which was treated as such having been set aside by the this
Court
against the petitioner and confirming the
same besides treating the period of suspension from 06.01.2011
to 14.01.2013 as "Not on Duty" vide impugned ... petitioner into service with all
consequential benefits duly treating the period of suspension as
on duty for all purposes....".
2. Brief facts
order dated
22.1.2016 rejecting the request of the petitioner for revocation of
suspension and seeking a declaration that the continued suspension
beyond 1.12.2015 is void ... constable in the Railway Protection Force at
Chengannur, was placed under suspension on 01.09.2015 by Ext.P1
order on the ground that an investigation