flat was
temporary building with temporary roof etc., however the flats to be
sold were ready for possession and the complainant shown the
actual flat ... with same
quality of items and fixtures as displayed in the sample flat. All
necessary approvals and sanction from the Competent Authority
were obtained
R.Ravimaran S/O Ramachandram vs Union Of India Rep By Its Secertary The ... on
construction to the 'Corporate Debtor'/developer, till the sample
flat is ready. It was correlatively decided that 'both parties have rights
complaint), in the event the builder failed to handover possession of the flat to the complainants, complete in all respect, within 15 days ... discussed about the project. The representative of the builder showed a sample flat and the amenities and facilities provided to it. He assured that
foundation civil
work and compound wall are in progress. Further, sample flat is
ready and site office is completed on site.
MPCB issued show-cause
project would commence very soon and the possession of the flat would be
handed over by the opposite party on or before 2012. The Opposite ... from the opposite party wherein they were informed that a sample flat was
ready and they could see the same by paying visit
project would commence very soon and the possession of the flat would be
handed over by the opposite party on or before 2012. The Opposite ... from the opposite party wherein they were informed that a sample flat was
ready and they could see the same by paying visit
Agreement, the Appellant Builder was bound to deliver the possession of the Flat within 36 months from the date of the execution of the Agreement ... water, sewerage, electricity wood work flooring etc. as shown in the sample flat, had not been completed by the Appellant Builder. Vide letter dated
deficiencies, fixtures and fittings required to
be done in accordance with sample flat;
c) pay Rs. 8,00,000/- to the complainants towards delay ... flat which was not constructed or finished in
accordance with the sample flat.
3. A legal notice dated 29.10.2018 was sent to the Opposite Parties
price of the flat, and they requested the OPs to remove the deficiencies, but on 16.10.2015, latter flatly refused to do the needful. The complainants ... with unsatisfactory & utterly deficient state and nowhere matched the sample flat, which was shown to the complainants at the time of booking and also
