place of
occurrence in this case. Ext.P6 scene plan was prepared by
PW12-the Village Officer, Vettiyar in accordance with ... mahazar. In Ext.P6 scene plan, the place of occurrence is
clearly numbered as No.4. It is evident from Exts
scene of
occurrence. Rule 75 of the Criminal Rules of Practice is
pointed out to emphasize the importance of the Scene
Plan. Koshy @ Baby ... with reference to the scene of occurrence. Though the
Village Officer, PW 38 deposed that he prepared the scene
plan on the instruction
deceased. PW8 is an attestor to the Ext.P3 scene mahazar,
Crl.A. No.1504 of 2003
-: 5 :-
PW4 is an attestor ... PW12
is the Village Officer who prepared the Ext.P8 scene plan,
PW13 is the Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, who recorded
Special Village
Officer of Kaipamangalam village proved Ext.P21 scene
plan as also Ext.P22 possession certificate showing that the
owner ... same day. Thereafter, PW24 proceeded to guard the
scene.
Z. PW25 (Suresh Kumar) who was the Circle
Inspector of Valappad conducted the entire investigation
Sunil Kumar @ Suni vs The State Of Kerala on 31 March, 2012
Author: A.M
accused.
20. PW9, a loading and unloading worker,
attested Ext.P3 scene mahazar, by which MO3 (weapon), a
wooden plank, MO6 a pair ... MO11
mobile phone. PW20 is the Village Officer who prepared
scene plans Ext.P16 to P19.
21. PW17 is the Doctor
scene of the crime is
not located correctly. One must carefully go through Ext.P5
scene mahazar as also Ext.P2 scene plan
investigation during which he had got prepared Ext.P4
scene plan. It is the further evidence of PW.2 that, during
his investigation ... investigation and it was PW.5 who prepared Ext.P8 scene
mahazar. During the examination of Ext.P5, particularly in
his cross-examination
Manikandan vs State Of Kerala on 19 October, 2020
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2020 KER 808
deceased by the assailants.
40. PW22 prepared Ext.P18 scene plan. PW23 produced Ext.P19
ownership certificate in respect of the house
