Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 571 (1.75 seconds)

Ludhiana Improvement Trust vs Vijay Lakshmi on 8 June, 2017

conditions of allotment letter. It was further submitted that OP charged Rs.910/- vide receipt No.57054 dated 28.07.1983, being compounding charges. She applied ... through memo in question was based on imaginary and wrong calculations. Complainant got knowledge about the notice qua second enhancement of the price through President
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ludhiana Improvement Trust vs Manmohan Lal on 8 June, 2017

vide letter dated 25.11.2014 bearing memo No.10792 claimed Rs.40,596/-, being amount of instalment of second enhancement. The claim has been put forth ... through memo in question was based on imaginary and wrong calculation. Complainant got knowledge about the notice qua second enhancement of the price through President
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

1. India Info Line Securities Pvt Ltd., ... vs 1. Sri Pullapantula Murli Kantha Rao And ... on 29 October, 2012

entertain the complaint. 10. The counsel for the appellants had filed memo of written arguments. 11. The point for consideration is whether the order ... appellant and the courier service of the second appellant by the appellant. The first respondent had charged the appellants with forgery of his signature
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next