respect of charge memo issued on 7.1.2005
as well as the charge memo issued on 26.8.2010. The learned counsel submitted
that the second respondent issued ... framing first charge memo. In the said
case for the charge memo enquiry was conducted and fine was imposed. In the
second charge memo framed
which is the subject
matter for the earlier charge memo, dated 14.09.2009, the present impugned
charge memo has been issued under Section ... impugned
charge memo, the earlier charge memo and the final order are mentioned, the
third respondent has issued the second charge memo based
Officer was appointed to go into the similar charge of encroachment by issuing second charge memo dated 24.5.1995. The charge memo dated 24.5.1995 reads thus ... have differed with the findings and should have proceeded further. Instead, second charge memo was issued containing one charge, which was not proved during
petitioner was summoned for enquiry on 3.7.1998 with respect to the second charge memo wherein he participated and the Enquiry Officer submitted his report, which ... enquiry and no final order is passed with regard to the second charge memo dated 5.6.1998 since the petitioner has not filed remarks
Enquiry Officer in respect of two charges, viz., i) first charge memo dated 25.4.1995 alleging that on 13.4.1995, at 1.00 p.m. he attacked ... Maran, an employee in the Corporation Ration shop and (ii) the second charge memo issued to the appellant on 16.6.1995 alleging that
order of final show cause notice
dated 10.4.2002 and the charge memo dated 12.5.2005 and
29.7.2005 respectively.
2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of these ... charges
and on 22.2.2000, the petitioner submitted his explanation.
On 1.4.2000 second charge memo was issued. The third
respondent conducted enquiry in respect
contention that without cancelling the first charge memo the second charge memo cannot be sustained in view of the specific averments contained in the counter ... affidavit that after cancelling charge momo issued in PR.30/82, fresh charge memo in PR 66/82 was issued.
11. The petitioner
Tamil Nadu Housing Board. The second respondent consequently issued the impugned charge memo alleging that the petitioner and other five officers violated Rule ... quashed the charge memo. Similarly in 2006 (1) CTC 476 ( Parameswaran v. State of Tamil Nadu ) the Division Bench quashed the charge memo by taking
given pardon by the Management. On 23.5.1986, a charge memo was issued to the second respondent, for which the second respondent gave an undertaking that ... appropriate action under Criminal Law. The second respondent was suspended from service. Petitioner management also issued charge memo dated 6.9.1990 and an explanation was sought
given pardon by the Management. On 23.5.1986, a charge memo was issued to the second respondent, for which the second respondent gave an undertaking that ... appropriate action under Criminal Law. The second respondent was suspended from service. Petitioner management also issued charge memo dated 6.9.1990 and an explanation was sought
