West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006
West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006
WEST BENGAL
India
West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2967 (0.10 seconds)Mrinal Kanti Sil vs Smt. Sampa Kabiraj on 14 March, 2017
avails both the remedies,
the cases shall stand amalgamated in terms of Section 210 Cr.P.C.
Similarly, in the complaint case when an order ... assail such order of
acquittal either under the proviso to Section 392 Cr.P.C. as a
'complainant' or under Section
Ram Naresh And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. on 22 September, 2017
falsity of defence cannot be taken into consideration with the help of Section 106 of the Evidence Act. It is merely for the satisfaction ... September 22nd, 2017
SKD
In view of the provisions contained in Section 392 Cr.P.C. and the law laid down by a Division Bench
Surendra @ Sonu @ Bholu vs State Of Rajasthan Through P P on 24 July, 2017
Magistrate, Pilani (Raj.) in Criminal Case No.492/2016, whereby
the petitioner has been convicted for offence under Section 392
... submitted the charge-sheet
against the petitioner. Petitioner was charged under Section 392
I.P.C. On behalf of the prosecution, statement of Vishnu Bhagwan
Kanha @ Kanhaiya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 August, 2017
applicant has filed this revision under Section 397 r/w
401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the
order dated 30/06/2017 passed ... 2017 passed
on the application filed under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C.
Section 392 of the Cr.P.C. provides that no revision
Ajay Jems vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 August, 2017
applicant has filed this revision under Section 397 r/w
401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the
order dated 21/07/2017 passed ... 2017 passed
on application filed under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C.
Section 392 of the Cr.P.C. provides that no revision would
Suraj And Anr vs State Of Rajasthan Through Pp on 3 November, 2017
registered at Police Station Nagar,
District Bharatpur for offence under Sections 392 I.P.C.
3. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner ... petitioner-Suraj has six cases out of which
one is of Section 392 Cr.P.C. He was arrested from the spot
Chandra Prakash @ Chunky Jethani vs State on 13 November, 2017
Lohra
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 10198 / 2017
Chandra Prakash @ Chunky Jethani S/o Manohar ... case and
taking into account alleged criminal delinquency of the petitioner
for offence under Section 392 Cr.P.C., which is triable by
Magistrate, without
Manoj Dahiya vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 November, 2017
petitioner- Manoj Dahiya has been convicted for
a
offence under Section 392 Cr.P.C vide judgement dated
hy
12.09.2014 passed
Kameshwar Prasad Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 29 June, 2017
been referred to this Bench in terms
of Section 392 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short
„ Cr.P.C .‟) and that ... 1048 of 2009 dt.29-06-2017
3/49
Section 392 of the Cr.P.C.
3. After hearing the parties and appreciating the
evidence