Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 359 (2.35 seconds)

Narsinhbhai vs State on 18 January, 2010

purchasers declared void under the provisions of the Fragmentation Act, further proceedings under Section 84-C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act could ... Bombay Prevention and Fragmentation and Consolidation of Land Act, no proceedings under Section 84-C of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act was maintainable
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M R Shah - Full Document

Yusuf vs State on 19 July, 2011

held that as there was breach of provisions of Section 63 of the Act, Section 84(C) of the Act was attracted and directed vesting ... agriculturists, hence it is proved that violation of Section 63 of the Tenancy Act is committed. Therefore, I pass order to vest the disputed land
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next