Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 88 (0.62 seconds)

Smt Rinki vs State Of U.P. on 22 August, 2019

Section 5 / 6 , 16 / 17 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012, Police Station Goverdhan, District Mathura. This is the second bail ... page no.16 to the bail present second application, contents of which is self explicit. The applicant is a woman. The applicant is in jail
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - V Sinha - Full Document

Brijesh Sahni vs State Of U.P. on 28 November, 2019

which are quite explicit; that in her 161 Cr.P.C . statement she categorically stated that "????, ?? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ?????? ?? ?????? ???? ??? ???? ?? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ?? ??? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???" The further contention is that with regard ... explicit; that the reasons for delay in lodging the FIR is that as the girl was in apprehension regarding publicity of video; that further contention
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - V Sinha - Full Document

Sonoo Alias Sonu vs State Of U.P. on 8 February, 2023

India and foreign countries are indulging in circulating, storing and viewing child sexual exploitation material (CSEM) through various social media platforms/groups. Such persons were ... involved in publishing/transmitting child sexual exploitation materials in electronic form depicting children engaged in sexually explicit conduct and are collecting/seeking/browsing/downloading/exchanging
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - D K Singh - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next