petitioner
herein. It is alleged that all the 3 accused had shared the common
intention and the overt acts were committed by the 2nd accused ... absolutely no features in this case which would justify or warrant the
invocation of the extraordinary equitable discretion under Section
also, though
unsatisfactory, is not, according to me, sufficient to justify the invocation
of the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
14. The other ... been proved. He further contends that there is no
shared household as specified in the expression in Section 2(s) . These are,
according
wife. In matrimony, there must be partnership, affection,
caring and sharing. No privilege of the ruler over the ruled can
be claimed by the husband ... career ambitions of his wife. We are unable to
agree that the invocation of the assumed anachronistic
MA 99 & 152 OF 2009 42
prerogative
were absolutely correct in coming to the concurrent conclusion
that the contestants shared the relationship of matrimony and
not anything else. The materials available before ... marriage between the contestants does not, therefore, at all
warrant interference by invocation of the extraordinary inherent
jurisdiction.
11. There are indications to show that
Shine C/O. Chandran vs State Of Kerala on 4 February, 2009
Author: Thomas P
illegality and the
same has to be set at right in invocation of the revisional jurisdiction of
this Court. A scanning of the impugned common ... that the first
and second respondents are entitled to reside at the shared household.
In the said factual and legal positions obtained in this case
files
and re-opening of assessment on the issue of valuation of
shares would be beyond the jurisdiction of the respondents
under Section ... years) under the
proviso to Section 147 of the IT Act. For invocation of a larger
period of limitation, twin conditions are to be satisfied
also, though
unsatisfactory, is not, according to me, sufficient to justify the invocation
of the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
14. The other ... been proved. He further contends that there is no
shared household as specified in the expression in Section 2(s) . These are,
according
dated 24-10-1985 to the State Bank of India demanding invocation of bank guarantee. Bank was directed to pay the balance consideration ... defendant, it was stated that all negotiations for the transfer of the shares were made between the plaintiffs and one L.K. Pabhu, the husband
arbitrator. Respondents however chose not to respond to the said
notice of invocation and hence the petitioner has moved this
Arbitration Request invoking Section ... claim of the petitioner that he is entitled to
be given a share of the profit is false and incorrect. It is stated that
