Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2785 (2.88 seconds)

Mayaram Nayak vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajendra Yaduwanshi vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar Gupta vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sahabuddin vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vishnu Das Mahant vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Santosh Kumar Sahu vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Narayan Soni vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manjeet Soni vs Union Of India on 14 May, 2026

they became eligible, and that the subsequent action of shifting them to a contractual/outsourcing system is arbitrary, illegal, and liable to be set aside ... demand for regularization and continued to assert that the shift to a contractual employment system through outsourcing agencies was illegal and arbitrary
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next