force. Hence the witnesses who speaks about the source code and
other software issue as alleged by the defacto complainant cannot be
taken ... maintained the source code as per the Information
Technology Act . Hence the list witnesses, which speaks about the
source code and other software issue
force. Hence the witnesses who speaks about the source code and
other software issue as alleged by the defacto complainant cannot be
taken ... maintained the source code as per the Information
Technology Act . Hence the list witnesses, which speaks about the
source code and other software issue
that she has no independent
source of income and is dependent on her parents. Whereas, the
respondent is a software engineer placed in a reputed ... under Section 125 CrPC, rejected the application by
impugned order on the similar findings as in application under
Section 125 CrPC.
Criticizing the order
Jignesh Kishorebhai Bhajiawala vs State Of Gujarat & on 14 July, 2017
Author: J.B
Mumbai Grahak Panchayat, Through ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 5 May, 2017
Author: A
G.R.L. Engineers vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 1 February, 2017
Bench
Bhanuben W/O Rameshbhai Jagubhai Patel ... vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 29 March
Smt. Priyanka vs Deepak on 31 January, 2017
Author: S.K.Awasthi
Bench: S.K
State vs Mohd. Sahid & Ors. on 9 August, 2017
IN THE COURT OF DR
State vs . Vijay Singh Bainsla Page No. 1/69 on 4 February, 2017
IN THE
