force. Hence the witnesses who speaks about the source code and
other software issue as alleged by the defacto complainant cannot be
taken ... maintained the source code as per the Information
Technology Act . Hence the list witnesses, which speaks about the
source code and other software issue
force. Hence the witnesses who speaks about the source code and
other software issue as alleged by the defacto complainant cannot be
taken ... maintained the source code as per the Information
Technology Act . Hence the list witnesses, which speaks about the
source code and other software issue
correspondence that the defendant has not provided the source code and user manuals for the MMS Software. Even as late as 3rd February ... source code and the user manual and in one of its letter, the defendant company has clearly stated that the source code and the user
N.Banu (A1) vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 24 April, 2017
THE HIGH COURT
M/S. Smart Chip Ltd vs The Secretary To Government on 23 August, 2017
Author
M/S.N.Ranga Rao & Sons vs M/S.Amrutha Aromatics on 14 September
The Registrar (Judicial) vs The Secretary To Government on 12 September, 2017
Bench: K.K
Naresh Prasad Agarwal vs The State on 17 April, 2017
Author: T. Mathivanan
Bench: T
Naresh Prasad Agarwal vs The State on 17 April, 2017
Author: T. Mathivanan
Bench: T
C.Edward vs The State Rep. By on 22 August, 2017
Author: P. Velmurugan
Bench
