about the case of the present respondent no. 1 (order dated
06.12.2021 in case no. 12788/1011/2021, Shri Amit Yadav v. SSC ... Case No. 12788/1011/2021
( Shri Amit Yadav Vs SSC ); Order dated 09.12.2021 in Case No.
12891/1011/2021 ( Shri Bishwadip Paul Vs SSC
appellants has relied upon the following judgments:
(i) (2020) 14 SSC 436 in the case of Arshnoor Singh
Vs.Harpal Kaur and others, to show ... male descendants upto three degrees below them.
(ii) (2015) 16 SSC 787 in the case of Yellapu Uma
Maheswari and another Vs. Buddha
Jagadheewararao
considered
view, the High Court ought to have examined the case of
the appellant in the light of the various communications
issued by the State ... Kesari , this Court held as under ( ML Kesari case SSC p
250, para 7) 7. It is evident from the above that there
considered
view, the High Court ought to have examined the case of
the appellant in the light of the various communications
issued by the State ... Kesari , this Court held as under ( ML Kesari case SSC p
250, para 7) 7. It is evident from the above that there
Bank, the same cannot be applicable to the facts of the present
case as the respondent-Bank has been in possession and
occupation ... para 19 of the said judgment ,
which reads thus: ( ABL International case, SSC p. 568)
19. Therefore, it is clear from the
above enunciation
interfered with
the States allocated by the SSC. In this case, SSC had
clubbed the vacancies of Delhi and Chandigarh under
Code preference ... against SSC but against the user department. Thus,
he stated that the SSC is only a proforma party in this case. Also the
original record
interfered with the
States allocated by the SSC. In this case,
SSC had clubbed the vacancies of Delhi
and Chandigarh under Code preference ... website of the Commission, i.e.
http://www.ssc.nic.in.
3. In the case of some candidates, who have been
granted benefit/relief
Apex Court in the case of Abuzar Hossain vs, State of West Bengal , 2012 (10) SSC 489 as well as the law laid down ... SSC 744. and Sanjeev kumar vs. State of U.P.2019 Vol (12) SSC 370. In the case of Parag Bhati
from a distance course (off-campus), their cases cannot be
considered for further promotion and accordingly the case
of respondent No.5 was considered ... Yash Pal-
Vs- The State of Chattisgarh reported in (2005) 5
SSC 420 case, UGC clarification regarding
permission granted to Sikkim Manipal University
construed that the selecting
agency, i.e., SSC in the instant case had ignored the
pendency of the criminal case despite specific
knowledge and recommended ... place when the recruiting
agency and the employer, i.e. SSC in the
instant case and the Board constituted for
considering the recommended names
