Ignou Road vs State Of Delhi on 15 January, 2015
injury. In protest petition, complainant has
stated that there was a structural defect in the building and employees
were forced to stay in small rooms
Search Results Page
Search Results
201 - 210 of 20685 (3.33 seconds)Cc No.: 2921/10 Pnb vs Om Prakash Kishan Lal & Co. 1/14 on 4 April, 2012
thereon was not denied by the drawee even though there was structural defect in the
cheque and one of the ground of return
Cc No.: 2831/10 Pnb vs Om Prakash Kishan Lal & Co. 1/14 on 4 April, 2012
thereon was not denied by the drawee even though there was structural defect in the
cheque and one of the ground of return
Real Estate (Regulation And Development) Act, 2016
Provided that the responsibility of the promoter, with respect to the structural defect or any other defect for such period as is referred ... shall be considered as one allottee only. (3) In case any structural defect or any other defect in workmanship, quality or provision of services
Food Corporation Of India & Ors vs M/S.Babulal Agrawal on 5 January, 2004
there is a faulty workmenship or the structure
is found to be defective, the party no.2 would
not be bound to take the plinths ... defendant. Condition no.9 also contemplated that if the structure was
found defective or workmenship was faulty the defendant could refuse
to take possession
Klaus Mittelbachert vs East India Hotels Ltd. on 3 January, 1997
structural design of the swimming pool at the hotel satisfied the requirements expected of such a swimming pool or whether the structure had a defect ... structure and services it offers and makes available. Any latent defect in its structure or service, which is hazardous to guests, would attract strict liability
Kalpita Enclave Co-Operative Housing ... vs Kiran Builders Pvt. Ltd. on 16 August, 1985
structure that has been made by the promoter. Thirdly, such defect or the unauthorised structure has to be brought to the notice of the promoter ... with. If within one year the possession is given no defect or unauthorised structure is brought to the notice of the promoter, it cannot
Modern Threads (India) Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 30 October, 1998
Modern Threads (India) Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax on 30 October, 1998
Equivalent
Deepak Galvanising & Engineering ... vs Government Of India And Anr. on 10 September, 1997
delivering the towers as agreed upon. Having noticed some defects in the structural stability of the towers constructed by the petitioner, the respondent-Department instructed ... delivering the towers as agreed upon. Having noticed some defects in the structural stability of the towers the respondent-Department instructed the petitioner-Company
Gell vs Taja Noora on 2 February, 1903
unfit" must be construed as relating only to defects ejusdem generis with the defects in equipment, and that neither of the expressions used would ... insufficient for that purpose, it is insufficiently found, and if defective in structure or material, it is otherwise unfit. If the motive power could