whole super-
structure built on such insecure foundations collapses,
proof of some incriminating circumstances, which might
have given support to merely defective evidence cannot
avert
whole super- structure
built on such insecure foundations collapses, proof of some
incriminating circumstances, which might have given support to
merely defective evidence cannot avert
punched out defect was present in right
temporal bone. Dura revealed 1 cm X 0.7 cm defect with bone
piece underlying skull defect. In brain ... lateral ventricle and it terminate in left frontal lobe. All the
abovementioned structures in brain were direction of track was
downward,backward and inward. Subdural
Manoj Pratap Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 24 June, 2022
Author: Dinesh Maheshwari
Rameshbhai Chandubhai Rathod vs State Of Gujarat on 27 April, 2009
Author: Arijit Pasayat
Bench
Rajesh Kumar vs State Th:Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 28 September, 2011
Equivalent
Rajendra Prasad Etc. Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 9 February, 1979
Equivalent citations
Sangeet & Anr vs State Of Haryana on 20 November, 2012
Equivalent citations: AIR 2013
commission of a cognizable offence and the procedure for
investigation is structured and regulated by Chapter XII of
the Code. The procedure prescribed is required ... detain us any further since
it is well settled that even a defect, if any, found in
investigation, however, serious has no direct bearing
Manoj vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 May, 2022
Author: S. Ravindra Bhat
