Opposite Party No.1. Most of the towers suffered from serious structural defects. Almost all the flats of every tower have seepage, since inception ... cause of seepage and immediately take steps to rectify this structural defect within two months or in alternative the Opposite Party No. 1 should
towards damages for the defective structures caused by
the opposite party and Rs.2,00,000/- for mental agony
sustained by the complainant ... that the flat of the
complainant
which 1s
in the walls
structural defects which
has led to cracks
substandard
party had used
the opposite
visible
carried out in the property. It is correct that if any structural
defects or inherent defects were noticed in the premises leased ... neglect on the part of the
complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August, 2011
which has rendered more than 50 per cent
carried out in the property. It is correct that if any structural
defects or inherent defects were noticed in the premises leased ... neglect
on the part of the complainant to remove the structural defects pending since
August, 2011 which has rendered more than 50 per cent
carried out in the property. It is correct that if any structural
defects or inherent defects were noticed in the premises leased ... neglect on the part of the
complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August, 2011
which has rendered more than 50 per cent
carried out in the property. It is correct that if any structural defects or inherent
defects were noticed in the premises leased ... neglect
on the part of the complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August,
___________________________________________________________________________________
CIS No. 11829/2016
Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. TG Leisure
respondent No.3 submits that being aggrieved from the
structural defect etc. the respondent No.3 filed the complaint
under RERA, which is maintainable ... respondent No.3 in which the plea inter
alia of „structural defect‟, has been raised.
11. It could also not be submitted by the learned
neglect on the part of the
complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August, 2011
which has rendered more than 50 per cent ... neglect on the part
of the complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August,
2011. It is further stated by Ld. Counsel
purpose of this clause, "minor
additions or alterations" excludes structural change including
an addition to the area or change in height ... shall be considered as one
allottee only.
(3) In case any structural defect or any other defect in
workmanship, quality or provision of services
exercised where the award
reveals a fundamental / structural defect. In my view in the
present case, no structural defects or fundamental defects are
revealed. Vijay
