Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1793 (1.47 seconds)

Shilpi Technocrats Llp vs M.P.Enterprises on 16 March, 2026

without proper connecting beams, compromising the structural integrity of the building. Upon objections raised by the defendants, structural defects were CS (Comm.) No.226/2020 ... further stated that a structural engineer was engaged to inspect the construction, and as per his report, serious structural defects were observed. The defects allegedly
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Ram Kumar Gupta (Huf) vs . on 9 June, 2022

carried out in the property. It is correct that if any structural defects or inherent defects were noticed in the premises leased ... neglect on the part of the complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August, ___________________________________________________________________________________ CIS No. 11829/2016 Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. TG Leisure
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Complainant vs . on 9 June, 2022

neglect on the part of the complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August, 2011 which has rendered more than 50 per cent ... neglect on the part of the complainant to remove the structural defects pending since August, 2011. It is further stated by Ld. Counsel
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Shakuntala vs Sh. Vishnu Dayal on 27 February, 2017

report   of   the Architect, i.e. PW­3 there are structural defects in the suit property and   hence   the   plaintiff   is   entitled   for   recovery ... from the defendant as damages. As per plaintiff, there are been structural defects in the construction  carried out by the defendant in the suit property
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next