Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1744 (1.23 seconds)

Revamma vs Shanthappa on 20 July, 1971

page 678, which is as under: "Cases of malformation or structural defects causing disability often arise for consideration under the head of practical impossibility ... other party is incapable of sexual intercourse from any malformation or structural defect or otherwise. Ordinarily and also as a matter of prudence the court
Karnataka High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Abdul Azeem vs Fahimunnisa Begum on 18 January, 1967

evidence of P.W. 3 that there was no constitutional defect in the structure of the male organ of the defendant does not however eclipse ... husband was suffering from functional impotence, notwithstanding the absence of any structural defect in the male organ, the certificate granted by the District Surgeon which
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Director vs The Registrar on 17 February, 2026

thereafter function as an impartial enquiry authority and this creates a structural defect in holding the enquiry, which is in violation of Article ... Lokayukta and there is conflict of interest within the Lokayukta structure itself. 11. The learned Single Judge has further held that different wings of Lokayukta
Karnataka High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Registrar vs Director on 17 February, 2026

thereafter function as an impartial enquiry authority and this creates a structural defect in holding the enquiry, which is in violation of Article ... Lokayukta and there is conflict of interest within the Lokayukta structure itself. 11. The learned Single Judge has further held that different wings of Lokayukta
Karnataka High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next