Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 776 (1.13 seconds)

Eternit Everest Ltd. vs Abraham on 27 May, 2003

fact, was due to the defective material and bad quality of the asbestos sheets and it was a manufacturing defect. There was an implied warranty ... leakage and dripping of water was not due to any structural defect of the theatre, or lack of ventilation or because of water entering through
Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Lt. Col Johnson Chacko Verghese (Retd.) vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Defense, ... on 3 February, 2025

during construction. Many reports indicated that while there were no major structural defects initially identified (as noted by Bureau Veritas), various functional distress features needed ... BVIPL. The building should be under constant observation. If any major structural defects are seen, they should be brought to the attention of an expert
Kerala High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mathew Cherian vs Union Of India on 3 February, 2025

during construction. Many reports indicated that while there were no major structural defects initially identified (as noted by Bureau Veritas), various functional distress features needed ... BVIPL. The building should be under constant observation. If any major structural defects are seen, they should be brought to the attention of an expert
Kerala High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Radhakrishnan Nair M.R vs Union Of India on 3 February, 2025

during construction. Many reports indicated that while there were no major structural defects initially identified (as noted by Bureau Veritas), various functional distress features needed ... BVIPL. The building should be under constant observation. If any major structural defects are seen, they should be brought to the attention of an expert
Kerala High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next