Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 700 (1.08 seconds)

M Ravindra Rao vs South Western Railway on 11 August, 2022

applicant had not qualified in the selection process initiated in 2012. He had qualified in the selection process initiated in 2015. However, since major penalty ... participated in the subsequent selection process, then his claim to be a part of the earlier selection process stands automatically extinguished. Even
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

N Kalimullah vs South Western Railway on 18 December, 2023

noticed that the applicant Shri Kalimullah had appeared in a subsequent selection process notified on 29.8.2019, where he has been declared as eligible for consideration ... Kalimallah had subsequently acquired 10+2 qualification, in the year 2019, which rendered him eligible to apply for the post in the process notified
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Subramanyam vs South Western Railway on 18 December, 2023

noticed that the applicant Shri Kalimullah had appeared in a subsequent selection process notified on 29.8.2019, where he has been declared as eligible for consideration ... Kalimallah had subsequently acquired 10+2 qualification, in the year 2019, which rendered him eligible to apply for the post in the process notified
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M R Harish Kumar And Anr vs Doordarshan on 1 June, 2023

these rules. They failed to qualify despite participating in the subsequent selection process conducted by the UPSC in the year 1995. They have been subsequently ... Doordarshan cannot be countenanced. The applicants had subsequently failed to qualify in the selection process conducted by the UPSC in 1995 and hence, cannot claim
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R Dhanasekaran vs South Western Railway on 3 April, 2024

immediately at the time of selection/appointments. 11. It is pertinent to note that the candidates selected in the selection panel and appointed have scored ... 2022/CAT/BANGALORE applicant in the written examination and in the subsequent selection process, the applicant has been selected and appointed. 12. In compliance with
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R Kesavan And Ors vs South Western Railway on 23 November, 2022

applicants had willingly participated in the selection process with the knowledge that the process of selection and preparation of panel for these posts would follow ... entire selection process. After having willingly participated in the entire process, the applicants cannot now turn and challenge the selection process on this ground
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anthony Daniel vs South Western Railway on 16 March, 2023

process followed was not as per the selection process which was notified and informed to all the applicants. The preparation of the selection panel, therefore ... entire selection process. After having willingly participated in the entire process, the applicants cannot now turn and challenge the selection process on this ground
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kiran B vs Bhabha Atomic Research Centre on 26 September, 2024

this basic document. If the applicant has participated in the selection process without murmur, subsequently after selection and going through the training and related part ... selection process as he got selected, and after selection he joined and completed the training and was offered appointment. He went through selection, training
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt M Meenakshi vs M/O Defence on 30 December, 2019

appointed as a result of earlier selection being senior to those appointed as a result of subsequent selection. The applicant contends that she had secured ... unfilled vacancies were filled up later through a subsequent process of selection. The manner of determining inter se seniority between promotee and direct recruits
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next