subject to computer added scrutiny
selection and there was no human intervention involved in the
selection process and subsequently notices
Caryle India Advisors P.Ltd, Mumbai vs Ito 14(1)(2), Mumbai on 27 February
Temasek Holdings Advisors India P.Ltd, ... vs Assessee on 23 February, 2012
आयकर अपील य
initially processed under section
143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case was selected for
scrutiny under the Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS)
system
which was processed under Section
143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the return was selected for
scrutiny through Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection under
'Limited
return was processed
u/s.143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case was manually selected for scrutiny
under compulsory selection criteria. Accordingly, statutory notices
personnel such as recruitment, selection, placement, by designing, developing and printing suitable measurement tests/tools, assessment of answer papers and processing results of examinations ... relationship between candidates' performance in selection tests/tools and various biographies variables and/or their subsequent performance during training period and later
Vodafone India Services P.Ltd ... vs Assessee on 8 April, 2013
ITA No.7140&
initially
processed under section 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the
cases of the assessee were selected for scrutiny through
Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS
processed under section 143(1) . Subsequently, the case was
selected for complete scrutiny. As recorded in the assessment
order, the reasons for selection of scrutiny