Authority vide Notification no.
15/14/2010-DGAD had initiated a sunset review of anti-dumping duty
imposed by Notification ... contended that thereafter on 19 November, 2011 the
time period of sunset review had expired, by a notification no. 15/14/2010-
DGAD, the Designated
Designated
Authority on 4 October 2008 in a second sunset review of Anti-dumping duty.
The appeal before the CESTAT was filed under the provisions
dated
30.7.2003 and Notification No. 100/2004 Cus dated
28.9.2004, the Sunset Review initiated by the DG AD,
continued Anti-dumping duty on import
time it was expected to review all cases registered
under the principal Act (other than the cases already reviewed by it)
irrespective of whether ... review of the specified cases has been fixed upto one
year from the commencement of the Repeal Act. Within such time the
Review committee
time it was expected to review all cases registered
under the principal Act (other than the cases already reviewed by it)
irrespective of whether ... review of the specified cases has been fixed upto one
year from the commencement of the Repeal Act. Within such time the
Review committee
Malak Khan vs The King-Emperor on 3 July, 1945
Equivalent citations: (1946)48BOMLR132
JUDGMENT
Kessowji Issur vs The Great Indian Peninsula Railway on 9 May, 1907
Equivalent citations: (1907
High Court On Its Own Motion ( In The ... vs Bhiwandi Nizampur Municipal ... on 26 February
Kamalakar Mahadev Bhagat vs Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. on 5 August, 1960
Equivalent citations
Goa Foundation vs Goa State Coastal Zone Management ... on 20 December, 2000
Equivalent citations: 2001
