order dated 14.07.2022, the appeal filed by the
petitioner against the surcharge order dated 27.12.2017 passed by the first
respondent Deputy Registrar of Co-operative ... dismissed.
4. The Petitioner is the 2nd defendant in the Surcharge order dated
27.12.2017 passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies,
Cheranmahadevi
entire records relating to the
impugned order dated 25.09.2018 made in surcharge order Tha.Va.1/2017-
18 passed by the 2nd respondent, quash ... writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the
impugned surcharge order passed by the 2 nd respondent in his proceedings
dated 25.09.2018 bearing
auction the
properties of the petitioners herein, in view of the Surcharge order dated
19.05.2022. The 2nd petitioner in respective writ petitions were the employee ... respondent/Society and have suffered surcharge order under Section 87
of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Society Act on 19.05.2022. The 2nd
petitioners
Mandamus, directing the respondent to furnish the
certified copy of Surcharge Order, dated 24.08.2012 in Na.Ka.No.303/2011
SaPa along with enclosures ... petition by directing the respondent to
furnish the certified copy of Surcharge Order, dated 24.08.2012 in
Na.K.aNo.303/2011 SA Pa along with
Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 against two surcharge
orders passed under Section 87 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies ... surcharge
proceedings initiated against the second respondent. Therefore, the
dropping of the surcharge proceedings by the learned Principal District
Judge, Madurai, vide order dated
ordered by the fourth respondent under Section 87 of the Tamil
Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 vide order dated 21.11.2019.
3. The aforesaid surcharge ... petitioner and other nine persons to show cause as to why surcharge
orders should not be passed against them and that the petitioner has also
filed C.M.A(CS)No.41 of 2022 against the Surcharge
Order, dated 23.05.2022 before the learned Principal District Judge, Special
Tribunal ... pending adjudication before the
first respondent/Deputy Registrar after the Surcharge Order was passed on
23.05.2022.
8. Further, it is submitted that after the aforesaid
were initiated against the second
respondent on 24.05.2019. Therefore, a surcharge proceeding was also
initiated under Section 87 of the Act on 28.08.2019 against ... dated 26.06.2019.
8. Pending the said surcharge proceedings, the petitioner purchased the
property on 22.09.2020. The surcharge order was ultimately passed on 27.04.2021
against
former employees
of the second petitioner Bank against 25 different surcharge orders, all dated
14.10.1998, which came to be passed in respect of the following ... Government. The surcharge proceedings are based
on the enquiry report of the Enquiry Officer dated 21.07.1997. 25 surcharge orders,
which came to be passed
further submitted that the second respondent proceeded to
pass the surcharge order dated 28.8.2014 without considering the reply of
the petitioner.
16. It is therefore ... third respondent, this Court is inclined to quash the
impugned surcharge order dated 28.8.2014 passed by the second respondent
and the impugned order dated
