order, vide its order dated 27.04.2000 and ordered
for re-enquiry. Accordingly, as per the order of the District Co-
operative Tribunal, Dharmaputi, the Surcharge ... Court
considered the scope of Section 87 surcharge proceedings and
found that to pass a surcharge order under Section 87 of the
Tamil Nadu
petition impugns an order dated 06 March 2019 passed by the Chief Development Officer and consequential orders imposing surcharge upon the petitioner. The order records ... District Magistrate is competent to pass order of removal and can also pass order of surcharge, the proceedings on this score cannot be faulted. Once
However, the Surcharge Officer, without properly
considering the explanation submitted by the Managing Committee
in its proper perspective issued the impugned Surcharge Order vide
proceedings ... Revised Audit Report submitted during the course of surcharge
proceedings and the said impugned surcharge order is not preceded
by any show cause notice
bank. Hence, surcharge proceedings were
initiated against the petitioners and others and surcharge order
dated 09.12.2004 was passed for the recovery ... surcharge proceedings against the petitioners under Section
87 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. Therefore,
this Court holds that the surcharge order
Electricity Regulatory Commission (Cross Subsidy
Surcharge, Additional Surcharge and Phasing of Cross
Subsidy) Regulations, 2006.
(2) The amount of surcharge shall compensate for the loss ... para 9.3 of the order (impugned
order).
(xii) The commission while issuing tariff order dated 25.05.2016
provided that additional surcharge of 78 paise
District Court, Perambalur confirming the
http://www.judis.nic.in
surcharge order dated 08.11.1999 made in Na.Ka.No.1543/99
Sa.Pa. passed ... file of the District Court,
Perambalur confirming the surcharge order dated 08.11.1999
made in Na.Ka.No.1543/99 Sa.Pa. passed
file of the District Court, Perambalur confirming the
surcharge order dated 08.11.1999 made in Na.Ka.No.1543/99
Sa.Pa. passed ... file of the District Court,
Perambalur confirming the surcharge order dated 08.11.1999
made in Na.Ka.No.1543/99 Sa.Pa. passed
filed against the suo motu surcharge order
No.1 of 2000-2001, dated 24.01.2014 for recovery of sum of Rs.6,00,000/-
against ... order dated
18.08.2003. In the Appeal filed against the said order before Co-operative
Tribunal, Tiruvannamalai, the said order was set aside vide order dated
Service, the respondent
herein, on the basis of such enquiry report ordered surcharge
proceedings under Section 87(1) of Tamil Nadu Co-operative
Societies ... issue the order on the 5 th respondent immediately. The
surcharge order was communicated to the 5th respondent on
12.06.2006 in Na.Ka.No.76498
respondent herein was
not let off, the surcharge proceedings were initiated, which concluded in the
surcharge order against him on 23.4.2002. He challenged the said ... surcharge notice as well as the finding recorded by the
http://www.judis.nic.in
12
second respondent in the surcharge order dated
