report, the second respondent initiated a surcharge proceedings under Section 87 of the Act and passed a surcharge order on 29.02.1996 against the third respondent ... with interest of 12 per cent per annum. Challenging the aforesaid surcharge order, the third respondent preferred an appeal
view that in order to pass a surcharge order under that section
against a person entrusted with the organisation and management of a co-
operative ... recommended for surcharge proceedings against the
petitioner on his mere negligence in his discharging duties. The second
respondent, in his surcharge order, had repeatedly stated
view that in order to pass a surcharge order under that section
against a person entrusted with the organisation and management of a co-
operative ... recommended for surcharge proceedings against the
petitioner on his mere negligence in his discharging duties. The second
respondent, in his surcharge order, had repeatedly stated
file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal, confirming the Surcharge Orders passed by the first respondent against the appellant in Na.Ka.1125/2008 ... file of the Principal District Judge, Namakkal, confirming the Surcharge Orders passed by the first respondent against the appellants in Na.Ka.1125/2008
Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned surcharge order made in Na.Ka. No.1/1995/Sa.Pa dated 31.07.2009 passed ... This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to quash the surcharge order made in Na.Ka. No.1/1995/Sa.Pa dated 31.07.2009 passed
Writ Petition in W.P.No.25148 of 2005 challenging the surcharge order dated 25.04.2005, which was allowed and the surcharge order was set aside ... liable for the surcharge liability. In the circumstances, the liability foisted on the deceased Secretary by conducting inquiry and passing surcharge orders after the demise
file of the Principal District
Court, Thanjavur reversing the surcharge order in R.C.No.12/2015 SF dated
20.01.2016 passed by the Deputy Registrar ... surcharge order in R.C.No.12/2015 SF dated 20.01.2016 passed by the Deputy
Registrar, Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Thanjavur.
2. According
Whether the appellant has committed misappropriation as found in the surcharge order, and Whether the appellant is liable to pay the surcharge amount, with interest ... Tribunal has passed order only with regard to the surcharge order, passed by the 3rd respondent and to pay the interest
learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a Surcharge order dated 02.02.2005 was passed by the second respondent against the third and fourth respondents ... preferred any appeal against the surcharge award passed by the second respondent. Since, the said surcharge order has become final, in view of allowing
appeal preferred by the original writ petitioner against the surcharge order passed by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies was allowed by the principal ... accordance with the Act.
5. Thus, it is clear that the surcharge order against the original writ petitioner is in force as on today
