2017 IN B.P.No.433 OF 2017 OF TDSAT, NEW DELHI.
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
------------------------------------
MADHYAMAM BROADCASTING LIMITED,
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT,15/594C,
VELLIPARAMBA ... Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for
brevity 'TDSAT') in a Broadcasting Petition
Supreme Court ruled that the Telecom Disputes Settlement and
Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) lacks jurisdiction to hear challenges
against regulations framed by TRAI under Section ... noted that
a challenge against the Tariff Order is indeed maintainable before
TDSAT. After evaluating the matter, the Judge concluded that the
contested provision
COPY OF PETITION NO.205 OF 2015 FILED BEFORE THE TDSAT
DTD. 1.5.2015.
EXT. P9 : COPY OF ORDER DTD.5.5.2015 PASSED BY THIS ... COPY OF MA 349 OF 2015.
EXT. P14: COPY OF TDSAT ORDER DTD. 7.10.2015 PASSED IN MA 349 OF 2015 IN
PETITION
even
travelled to Telecom Disputes Settlement & Appellate Tribunal (For
short 'TDSAT') and up to the Hon'ble Supreme Court ... ADNPL by various ancillary
directions in said regard having been issued by TDSAT and the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. The reference
issue is which
authority, i.e., TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of
India)/ TDSAT (Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate
Tribunal) or the Competition Commission of India ... that any such
allegation/dispute can only be raised before the TRAI/TDSAT and
not before the CCI. In the past, ADNPL had filed petitions
issue is which
authority, i.e., TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of
India)/ TDSAT (Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate
Tribunal) or the Competition Commission of India ... that any such
allegation/dispute can only be raised before the TRAI/TDSAT and
not before the CCI. In the past, ADNPL had filed petitions
appropriately raised before
the Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT
for short).
5. The learned counsel for the 4th respondent would contend that
the issue ... case of any dispute between service
providers, it is for the TDSAT to consider the matter. The
petitioner's contention is that
PETITION IN B. P. NO.
399/2021 ON THE FILES OF THE TDSAT, NEW
DELHI.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE EVIDENCE ... 2021 ON THE FILES OF THE TDSAT,
NEW DELHI.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE EVIDENCE BY WAY OF
AFFIDAVIT OF RW1 P. J. ANTONY
proceedings before the Telecom Disputes Settlement
and Appellate Tribunal (for short 'TDSAT') by filing Broadcasting
Petition No.393 of 2016. While that recovery ... signals to the 1st
respondent. This brought the 1st respondent before the TDSAT,
WA No. 1781 of 2017
-:2:-
who filed Broadcasting Petition
FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
BEFORE THE HON'BLE TDSAT WITHOUT ANNEXURES.
EXHIBIT P6. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 31ST MARCH ... FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE
THE HON'BLE TDSAT WITHOUT ANNEXURES.
EXHIBIT P13. TRUE COPY OF THE BROADCASTING PETITION BEARING
