l3hosale Bio Neem. is that. it is entitled to be refund of an
amount of Rs. 3.49.416-00, collected by the respondent
towards levy ... respondent for refund of Its. 3.49.416-00.
2. Perusal of the writ petition shows that.
pet it tot icr has submit ted represeiflatiot
plaintiff did not
come forward t eT the saic deed c eci ted ifl his favour Hi
IiII1 i lid ii fl i Itti ... agreement of sale?
2. Whether the trial Court it'as justi/ted in inldinq
that the suit ic not barred by time
days which is as under:
Annual interest ;_ea1f;1::ila.ted *l;1%' -- '$14,608.44
Monthly and interest would be
?40.58 tttt
Accordingly ... income tax is at liberty to
make an application .__to for refund of
excess income account of third
respondentm deducted beyond
exemptionllimit. tact that corporation
instant case.
USA in Feb.2011 which has been subsequently
refunded in April 2011. Hence, the transferor
company needs to file an affidavit ... ouipoge, On cecsiving" | the report, the Official
Liquidator has j indicat ted. tot this Court that the affairs of
the Transferee Company have
assailing the action of the KSFC and seeking for
a direction to refund the amount.
I
4
3. The learned single Judge while taking note ... ections statcment whc rein tht KSFC has
acimi:ted the pnsition that the amount due to them has
been settled In the KSFC with
brether ef
PW6 - Eswaregowda, he hae.VVe!»;i.c§:ted*-- 1;n_aiA.'f§1e"".fi3f.!':er of accused
had given ... given the same vte end when she askee to
refund the said ;a;n'§é>VLév
Apesh Construction Limited vs The Corporation Of Madurai on 2 November, 2012
Author: R.Sudhakar
The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Tyco Electronics Corporation ... on 21 February, 2012
Ramalingam A @ Amarnathan R And Anr vs Siddiqui H on 1 March, 2012
IN THE
Sripada Gouda S/O Ranganna Gouda ... vs State Of Karnataka on 22 March, 2012
Ps
