Suryanarayana Rao M V vs Deputy Commissioner on 30 June, 2011
rectJ the refund of seigniorage value
.. tr:ol/ec:'ted pursuant to Annexure-C from the
V."x--..V"petitioner, within
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 92 (0.40 seconds)Sri Niranjan S Pamadi vs Sri Shivaji R Shet on 28 November, 2011
entitled for refund of h alt
aistitution fee while preferring this appeal.
Ordered accordingly.
The High Court Registry 1s direct ted ta return
Smt Sarojamma vs Ningaiah on 21 November, 2011
ted .toV'Vlbe..t:refunded, immediately.
Office to draw award, accordingly.
Sd/-
JUDGE
The Chief Executive Officer vs Shri R S Chakrapani on 29 November, 2011
memo, whic
er, Court fee paid
sedilement o}
Lis direc ted to be refunded in favour
4
parties im equai proportion by issuing
Commissioner Of Central Excise vs M/S.Motherson Sumi Electric Wires on 12 April, 2011
Cenvat Credit
g Re£e'[email protected]édes fer sahctieh 92' refund in cash in
xv":j..reetg:~.ec:tVV" of geeds ... refund is only
in respect §.hputv"ete-dét"sattributable te the inputs utilized
'-ih the e':><ee:ted geedts
Suresh Agencies vs Commissioner Of Commercial on 13 January, 2011
fromiiityhe custVon--'ie:;f_s_,___s::he is net entitled to refund but the
to be forfeited to the Government ... hoici that the asseesee has--g"ee:iE'e§:ted
the tax from the Customers and therefore
any substance in the said contentE0n
Commissioner Of Central Excise vs M/S Keltech Energies Ltd on 8 March, 2011
érde cx OF the
Appellate Author
which he a gre anit ted vefund claimed
ine assessee ..
2. Ts: a peal pertains te the products supplied ... Company Lid., Manugeri.
# . 4 . # a
pertains to the period from
2
(the refund clann preferred by
same assessee for the period from
Mr. A N Viswanatha vs The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes on 28 July, 2011
arly 'd ealer under
sub-section (1) or Sh, 'at refund' of such 'amount or any part
thereof can be claiined ... admissible,-and that the amount so Claimed as refund is
actually. paid or recovered, he shail refund the amount or
ea
any part thereof. which
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. ... vs Sri V Chandrashekar on 21 June, 2011
allowed and the impugned
iudgintentieie-»nd aA_war'd}'da_ted 28112009 passed in MVC No.?150;'2006
the MACT, Bangaiore ... further proceedings on 38.2011
without: notice.
The Registry is directed to refund the amount. 1:)" 'the'
appellant
Sri K Ganasambandam S/O M R Kandaswamy ... vs Sri L Krishnamurthy S/O Late H Ningaiah on 18 January, 2011
ANOTHER, reported in ILR 2006 KAR
4032, the office is directed to refund the entire Court fee to the
ap;3eiEant's side.
6. This ... 2Q11g'-.:t"'i~s""reje't:ted ° V
as having become unnecessary