admitted that its
claim for refund from Central Excise department was rejected on
the ground that no refund of TED ... remedy for refund of the amount with the concerned authorities.
Whether the defendant approached the appropriate forum for
refund of TED
refund of security deposit in
respect of said work order, the defendants have taken a
plea that plaintiff is not entitled to refund for security ... same is
required to be refunded to the appellant/plain-
tiff.
25. Although during cross-examination, the PW1 admit-
ted that he had not submitted
dated 04.01.2023.
20. Coming to the issue of refund of security deposit and
earnest money in respect of said work orders, the de-
fendant ... same is
required to be refunded to the appellant/plain-
tiff.
22. Although during cross-examination, the PW1 admit-
ted that he had not submitted
said work order No. 15.
21. Coming to the issue of refund of security deposit and
earnest money in respect of said work order ... same is
required to be refunded to the appellant/plain-
tiff.
23. Although during cross-examination, the PW1 admit-
ted that he had not submitted
said work
order No. 396.
19. Coming to the issue of refund of security deposit and
earnest money in respect of said work order ... same is
required to be refunded to the appellant/plain-
tiff.
21. Although during cross-examination, the PW1 admit-
ted that he had not submitted
refund of security deposit in
respect of said work order, the defendants have taken a plea
that plaintiff is not entitled to refund for security ... amount. Admit-
tedly, there are no grounds for MCD to appro-
priate the security deposit. Thus, the same is
required to be refunded
plaintiff,
however, it is submitted that the plaintiff has not submit
ted any bills that he was contractually required to in
terms of Clause ... same is required to be refunded to the appel
lant/plaintiff.
23. Although during crossexamination, the PW1 admit
ted that he had not submitted
defen
dants have taken a plea that plaintiff is not entitled to
refund for security for want of compliance of Clause
CS (Comm.) No. 1405 ... same is required to be refunded to the appel
lant/plaintiff.
23. Although during crossexamination, the PW1 admit
ted that he had not submitted
work orders in ques-
tion).
22. Coming to the issue of refund of security deposit and
earnest money in respect of said work orders ... amount. Admit-
tedly, there are no grounds for MCD to appro-
priate the security deposit. Thus, the same is
required to be refunded
amount for work order no. 19).
18. Coming to the issue of refund of security deposit and
earnest money in respect of said work order ... amount. Admit-
tedly, there are no grounds for MCD to appro-
priate the security deposit. Thus, the same is
required to be refunded
