School Tribunal would have the jurisdiction in a matter relating to the termination of the services of an Assistant Teacher. When the Second Appeal came ... employee has instituted proceedings therein and asked for a declaration that termination of his services is null and void as being contrary to the provisions
filed by respondent No. 3 - employees, in all the petitions, challenging their termination by the petitioners. Though the judgments of the School Tribunal are separate ... employees are the employees of the petitioners and that the order of termination is bad in law. The observations made by the school tribunal
However, the Tribunal has erred in setting aside the order of termination of the services and granting reinstatement only on that ground. Once the Tribunal ... before the Additional School Tribunal, Chandrapur challenging his termination primarily on the ground that no inquiry contemplated by the Maharashtra Employees Private Schools (Conditions) Rules
permanent employees of the junior colleges,
who in turn challenged their termination on account of closure of junior
colleges.
3. The first main Petition being ... School Tribunal were instituted by respective permanent
employees questioning the action of termination of their services by the
concerned colleges.
5. Here
above petitioners preferred their appeals against their
common oral termination dated 15/07/2008 ... interim order, the School Tribunal protected all the
petitioners and their oral termination dated 15/07/2008 was stayed
till decision of appeal
Rule 16(3) of the Rules.
5. The private respondents challenged the termination of their
services by filing writ petitions mainly on the grounds that ... Bank to disclose the reasons for extension
of probation and termination of their services but no response was
received from them.
6. In the counter
restraining the Petitioners from acting upon
or in furtherance of any purported termination of the Reference to
mediation under the order of this ... Petitioner declined to attend the meeting by purporting
to reiterate his earlier termination and hence the meeting could not be held.
On 8 February Petitioner
sides. Issue before me is as to whether the impugned order
of termination is stigmatic and if so, whether it is sustainable without giving ... worked as
a Clerk from 24.7.2006 and was in employment till his termination dated
9.10.2009. For a continuous period of 3 years and 2 months
dismissing Appeal No.32 of 2008 filed by the petitioner
challenging the termination of his services with effect from 29-5-2008.
2. The facts ... along with Misc. Application No.3 of 2008 challenging otherwise
termination of his services with effect from 25-6-2007 and seeking
condonation of delay
issued by Principal of Smt. Ushabai Deshmukh Junior College, Achalpur City. This termination was challenged by respondent No. 2 by filing above mentioned appeal under ... Rules, 1981. He contends that his termination is illegal and against the principles of natural justice. The School Tribunal issued notice to the petitioner management
