Tata Cellular vs Union Of India on 26 July, 1994
Equivalent citations: 1996 AIR 11, 1994 SCC (6) 651, AIR 1996 SUPREME COURT ... Bombay Bombay
Bharati Cellular Hutchison Max
BPL Projects & Systems Bharati Cellular
Delhi Delhi
India Telecomp Ltd. BPL Projects & Systems
Tata Cellular
Indo Merchantiles Pvt. Ltd.
reported in (1997) 1 SCC 53 and Tata Cellular Vs. Union of India
reported in (1994) 6 SCC 651. The petitioner ... interference in respect of the tender.
In the case of Tata Cellular v/s Union of India reported in
1994 (6) SCC 651 again
issuing tenders has
been examined in depth by this Court in Tata Cellular vs. Union
of India [1994 (6) SCC 651]. After examining the entire ... significant cases on the subject is the three judge
decision in Tata Cellular v. Union of India , 1994 6 SCC 651 which
gave importance
issuing tenders has been examined in depth by this Court in
Tata Cellular vs. Union of India [1994 (6) SCC 651]. After
examining the entire ... significant cases on the subject is the three judge decision
in Tata Cellular v. Union of India , 1994 6 SCC 651 which
gave importance
upon the judgments of the
Supreme Court in the matters of Tata Cellular v. Union of
India1, Reliance Energy Ltd. & another v. Maharashtra
State
INDIA AND ANOTHER1 has held as follows:
"7. In Tata Cellular v. Union of India [Tata
Cellular v. Union of India ... manifestly arbitrary or unjust as
laid down by this Court in Tata Cellular v. Union of
2
(2022) 6 SCC 127
28
India [Tata Cellular
Supreme Court in the case of Tata Cellular v.
Union of India reported in (1994)6 SCC 651 as well as the
decision ... issuing tenders has
been examined in depth by this Court in Tata
Cellular vs. Union of India [1994 (6) SCC 651].
After examining the entire
being
the amount of license fees paid by TATA Cellular Ltd to Department of
telecommunication upto December 31, 2000, on the ground that the claim ... 01st January 2001, the assessee company taken over TATA Cellular
Ltd and accordingly the TATA cellular Ltd. merged with the assessee. At that
point
This position of law has been succinctly summed up
in Tata Cellular v. Union of India [Tata Cellular v. Union of
India ... Dunlop India Ltd. [(1985) 1 SCC 260 : 1985 SCC
(Tax) 75] , Tata Cellular v. Union of India [( 1994) 6 SCC 651]
, Ramniklal N. Bhutta
significant cases on the subject is the three-Judge
decision in Tata Cellular v. Union of India [Tata Cellular
v. Union of India ... procedural violation. This was quite clearly stated by
this Court (following Tata Cellular [Tata Cellular v.
Union of India, (1994) 6 SCC 651]) in Jagdish