have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak
have allowed proper set-off or telescoping effect of these transactions. Thus, after
considering the nature of transactions appearing in the seized material, telescoping
benefit ... abundantly clear that correct unaccounted income
can be derived by giving telescopic effect. However, the appellant has taken alternate
plea, though not accepted that peak