coolie in a steel company and had constructed a thatched hut
at Tenali. The hut of parents of Smt. Venkata Ramana was
situated ... short distance from the hut of A-4 at Tenali.
A-2 and A-3 after their marriage had come to stay with
coolie in a steel company and had constructed a thatched hut
at Tenali. The hut of parents of Smt. Venkata Ramana was
situated ... short distance from the hut of A-4 at Tenali.
A-2 and A-3 after their marriage had come to stay with
Jakka Devayya And Sons, Tenali vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras on 13 March, 1952
Equivalent citations: AIR1953MAD315, [1952]22ITR264(MAD), (1952)2MLJ555
appeal arises out of an order passed by the Subordinate Judge of Tenali in execution of a decree passed by the Subordinate Judge of Bapatla ... Bapatla Sub-Court and get it transferred to the Sub-Court at Tenali before he can seek execution.
3. A further complication arises on account
Mareddi Krishna Reddy vs Income-Tax Officer, Tenali. on 25 January, 1957
Equivalent citations: [1957]31ITR678(AP), AIR 1957 ANDHRA PRADESH 368, ILR (1957) ANDH
Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali Urban ... vs Movva Ranga Rao, Advocate And Ors. on 5 September, 1995
Equivalent citations: 1995(3)ALT718
JUDGMENT
Lingaraja Rath ... Writ Appeal i.e., the Special Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition), Vijayawada-Guntur-Tenali Urban Development Authority, Vijayawada, Krishna District. Altogether there were 99 land acquisition
file of the Sub Court, Tenali against Devineni Basavayya and Devineni Raghavayya. That suit was dismissed with costs. There was an appeal against the dismissal ... execution and had a precept issued by the Sub Court, Tenali, to the District Judge's Court, Masulipatam, for staying the execution
Vakati Prabhakar Reddy vs Tenali Mohan Rao on 14 June, 2002
Equivalent citations: 2003(2)ALT76
Author: B. Sudershan Reddy
Bench: B. Sudershan Reddy
Court at Bapatla to the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Tenali and the suits pending in the Bapatla Court were transferred to the Court ... Tenali. But this particular mortgage suit was not transferred. On May 8, 1934, the High Court disposed of the appeal which was pending against
Sait Sogmull Lachiram Firm Of Tenali vs Vallabhaneni Parandhamayya And Ors. on 5 April, 1940
Equivalent citations: (1940)2MLJ17, AIR 1940 MADRAS 716
JUDGMENT
Krishnaswami
