Section 16 in The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
16. Punishment for terrorist act.—
(1) Whoever commits a terrorist act shall,— (a) if such act has resulted
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 9489 (0.04 seconds)Section 20 in The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
terrorist gang or organisation.—
Any person who is a member of a terrorist gang or a terrorist organisation, which is involved in terrorist act, shall
Section 18 in The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
18. Punishment for conspiracy, etc.—
Whoever conspires or attempts to commit, or advocates, abets, advises ... knowingly facilitates] the commission of, a terrorist act or any act preparatory to the commission of a terrorist act, shall be punishable with imprisonment
Kartar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 March, 1994
matters pertaining to the Act of 1984, Act of
1985 and Act of 1987 and U.P. Act 16 of 1976.
2. Therefore ... TERRORIST AND DISRUPTIVE ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION)
ACT, 1987 (ACT 28 OF 1987)
11. Act 28 of 1987 was enacted as Act
State Of Maharashtra Etc. Etc vs Som Nath Thapa, Etc. Etc on 12 April, 1996
advised abetted and
knowingly facilitated the
commission of terrorists act and
acts preparatory to terrorists act
i.e. bomb blast and such other act
which ... February, 1993 knowingly
facilitated the commission of
terrorist act and acts preparatory
to terrorist act i.e. bomb blast
and such other acts which were
State Of Tamil Nadu Through ... vs Nalini And 25 Others on 11 May, 1999
Nalini (A-1) abetted the commission of the terrorist
act and acts preparatory to the terrorist act or knowingly
facilitated the commission of the terrorist ... member of a terrorists gang or a
terrorists organisation, which is involved in terrorist act,
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall
People'S Union For Civil Liberties & Anr vs Union Of India on 16 December, 2003
provides that whoever
'abets' a terrorist act or any preparatory act to a
terrorist act shall be punishable and this provision,
fails ... effect to further the
activities of any terrorist organization or the
commission of terrorist acts are not within the
mischief of Section 21 and hence
Sanjay Dutt vs State Of Maharashtra Tr.Cbi,Bombay on 21 March, 2013
abet and
knowingly facilitate the terrorist acts and/or any act preparatory to
the commission of terrorist acts and to render any assistance
financial ... connected with or incidental to terrorist activities. The other
offences being connected and inextricably intertwined with the terrorist
act.”
9) He further pointed out that
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur vs State Of Maharashtra on 12 July, 1994
under the Arms Act, 1959 , the Explosives Act, 1884 , the
Explosive Substances Act, 1908 or the Inflammable Substances
Act, 1952 and renders him liable ... trial of such offences. ... The Act is
a special Act and creates a new class of
offences called terrorist acts and disruptive
activities as defined
Hitendra Vishnu Thakur And Others Etc. ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 12 July, 1994
made under the Arms Act 1959, the Explosive Act, 1884 , the Explosive Substances Act 1908 or the Inflammable Substances Act 1952 and renders him liable ... trial of such offences.... The act is a special Act and creates a new class of offences called terrorist acts and disruptive activities as defined