Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.51 seconds)

Sri Pradip Kumar Mandal vs Prop./Manager M/S. Bengal ... on 31 March, 2016

sanctioned  by the Kolkata   Municipal Corporation  after obtaining  permission from the  Thika Controller. It also remains undisputed  that the Appellants  had entered into an agreement ... said property was a thika tenanted property. In such a situation,  obtaining permission from the Thika Controller by itself  cannot remove the apparent  defect  from
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Samir Dutta vs Smt. Mamata Das on 11 April, 2017

subject matter of the development agreement was a Thika land and the Respondents being Thika tenants did not have any right to transfer the property ... parties was an agreement for development only in respect of which Thika controller does not have any jurisdiction over such work of development
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Sri Netai Ghosh vs John Sharma on 7 August, 2015

khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy.  Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Netai Ghosh vs Chhandita Mitra on 7 August, 2015

khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy.  Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Netai Ghosh vs Subrata Kumar Saha on 7 August, 2015

khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy.  Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Netai Ghosh vs Pradip Kumar Ghosh on 7 August, 2015

khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy.  Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1