Court of Subordinate Judge transferred the suit to the Thika Controller under Section 29 of the said Act. During the pendency of that proceeding before ... Thika Controller, the West Bengal Legislature passed the Amendment Act, 1953, which came into force on 21-4-1953, which by Section 8 deleted Sections
sanctioned by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation after obtaining permission from the Thika Controller. It also remains undisputed that the Appellants had entered into an agreement ... said property was a thika tenanted property. In such a situation, obtaining permission from the Thika Controller by itself cannot remove the apparent defect from
subject matter of the development agreement was a Thika land and the Respondents being Thika tenants did not have any right to transfer the property ... parties was an agreement for development only in respect of which Thika controller does not have any jurisdiction over such work of development
building, sanctioned from the KMC and after obtaining approval from the Controller, Calcutta Thika Tenancy by order dated ... plan was sanctioned by the KMC with the approval of the Controller, Calcutta Thika Tenancy by his order dated 21-08-2012 and the construction
khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy. Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy. Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy. Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
khatal' and the applications were made before the Controller, Thika Tenancy. Under such circumstances, since the matter is pending before the competent Authority, that ... Controller, Thika Tenancy, the Appellants cannot be held responsible for non-supply of completion certificate. The Learned District Forum was not justified in holding that
Municipal Corporation is rectified by the Competent Authority, namely, Controller of Thika Tenancy, Kolkata, and the subject property is deleted as non-Khatal, occupancy/completion
Municipal Corporation is rectified by the Competent Authority, namely, Controller of Thika Tenancy, Kolkata, and the subject property is deleted as non-Khatal, occupancy/completion
