Himalayan Tile And Marble (Pvt.) Ltd. vs Francis V. Coutinho And Ors. on 23 July, 1970
Equivalent citations: AIR1971BOM341, (1970)72BOMLR910, AIR 1971 BOMBAY ... village Majas Mogra, Jogeshwari, Bombay admeasuring 2 acres. The Himalayan Tile and Marble (Private) Ltd., the Respondent No. 3 in the Petition are the appellant
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay ... vs Himalayan Tiles And Marble Private Ltd. on 29 November, 1973
Equivalent citations: [1975]100ITR177(BOM)
JUDGMENT
S.K. Desai ... carrying on various business under several names and styles such as Himalayan Tiles and Marbles, Modern Concrete Art Industries, Hima Spun Pipes Co., Agarwal Overseas
Hindustan Tiles And Cement Industries vs The State Of Maharashtra on 16 January, 1975
Equivalent citations: [1975]36STC326(BOM)
Bench: D.P. Madon ... applicants carry on the business of manufacturing and supplying tiles as also of supplying and fixing tiles. The work of fixing tiles carried
Cadar Constructions vs Tara Tiles on 12 October, 1983
Equivalent citations: AIR1984BOM258, 1984(2)BOMCR530, AIR 1984 BOMBAY ... 31st March 1968 the plaintiff had sold to the defendant flooring tiles and like material totally worth Rs. 27.521.54 inclusive
State Bank Of India vs Himalayan Tiles And Marble Pvt. Ltd. And ... on 21 July, 1993
Equivalent citations: 1994(2)BOMCR399, (1993)95BOMLR677
JUDGMENT
Hindustan Tiles Corporation vs Kisanlal Mataprasad Agrawal on 18 August, 1978
Equivalent citations: AIR1979BOM69, AIR 1979 BOMBAY 69
ORDER
1. This is a Revision Application ... filed the pre-
sent suit against the applicant defendant M/s. Hindustan Tiles Corporation, having its place of business at Ollur in Kerala State
there was bleeding from
her mouth and nose. They noticed one pharashi - tile (stone) lying near her
body.
3.4. Thereafter PW-3 approached the police ... that
they caused death of Laxmi by injuring her with the pharashi - tile (stone). In
the meantime, Anita Gaikwad, wife of the brother
claim made for value of superior pipes and similarly using inferior Mosaic Tiles but claiming the value of superior Mosaic Tiles.
D.W. 2 Surcsh ... superior one and costlier in value. Similarly, he says that the floor tiles used for the factory were of inferior type and there were cracks
hereinafter called the 'appellants'), are the manufacturers of 'Mosaic Tiles'. The appellants' products were initially classified by the department under ... Budget the tariff item 23D stood omitted and consequently 'Mosaic Tiles' were classified under the then T.I. 68 and were eligible
Nitco Tiles Lstd vs Dcit Cc34 on 28 January, 2021
Author: Milind N. Jadhav
Bench: Ujjal Bhuyan , Milind N. Jadhav
7. os itxa 2640 ... ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2640 OF 2009
Nitco Tiles Ltd .. Appellant
Versus
DCIT CC-34 .. Respondent
...................
Ms. Aasifa Khan
