Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. St. Francis Clay Decor Tiles on 10 October, 2014
Author: Antony Dominic
Bench: Antony Dominic
IN THE HIGH ... JOSEPH, SC
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/ASSESSEE :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M/S. ST. FRANCIS CLAY DECOR TILES,
THEKKEMURI.P.O., CHERUVALOOR,
KORATTY, THRISSUR-680 321
BY SRI.JOSEPH KODIANTHARA
Pappu And Anr. vs Raja Tile And Match Works on 25 February, 1988
Equivalent citations: (1989)ILLJ14KER
JUDGMENT
Bhaskaran Nambiar, J.
1. The applicability ... facts are not in dispute. The appellants are two employees of a Tile and Match Factory, claiming bonus for the year
Regional Director, E.S.I. Corpn. vs Sakthi Tiles on 10 June, 1988
Equivalent citations: [1989(58)FLR17], (1994)IIILLJ1197KER
JUDGMENT
Paripoornan
Koru vs Standard Tile And Clay Works (P) Ltd. And ... on 30 November, 1962
Equivalent citations: AIR1963KER324, AIR 1963 KERALA 324, (1964) 1 LABLJ
Kerala Tile And Clay Works vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax on 28 November, 1975
Equivalent citations: [1976]104ITR597(KER)
JUDGMENT
Viswanatha Iyer
Standard Stonewares And Tiles vs Appellate Authority on 15 March, 2004
Equivalent citations: 2004(2)KLT519, (2004)IIILLJ403KER
JUDGMENT
R. Rajendra Babu ... petitioner establishment, Standard Stonewares and Tiles, Thaikkattukara, Aluva, was a unit of Sudarsan Clay and Ceramics Ltd., Aluva. Respondents 2 to 15 were employees
that the appellant had used dolomite powder for the manufacture of mosaic tiles so as to attract the rate of tax applicable to mosaic chips ... that the powder sold by the appellant was used for manufacturing mosaic tiles for flooring purpose. This presumption was raised on the basis that
Corporation vs Hindustan Tile Works on 9 July, 1999
Equivalent citations: (2000)ILLJ425KER
Author: M.R. Hariharan Nair
Bench: M.R. Hariharan Nair
JUDGMENT ... decision in Regional Director, E. S. I. Corporation v. Sakthi Tiles , 1988 (2) KLT 280 and passed the impugned order. According to the learned counsel
case. Petitioners 1 to 3 are said to represent the owners of tile factories in Feroke and Quilon areas and the 4th petitioner ... Harrisons and Crossfield Ltd. The ownen of the tile factories, who are members of the 2nd petitioner, are mentioned in Paragraph 3, and the owners
Janatha Tile Works Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 10 February, 2006
Equivalent citations: (2006)202CTR(KER)103, [2006]283ITR35(KER), 2006(2)KLT426
