appeals herein are that the appellant herein are manufacturer of ceramic tiles. The office of DGCEI collected intelligence that the manufacturer of ceramic glazed tiles ... vitrified tiles were engaged in large scale evasion of Central Excise duty by not declaring the actual MRP on their product and Central Excise invoices
declared value was correct consists of (a) certificate from the manufacturer of tiles certifying that the sale value of 600 mm x 600 mm sized ... tiles was 30 RMB per piece (Chinese currency) one piece is = 0.36 Sq. Mtr. Thus one Sq. Mtr cost is 36.11 RMB taking the exchange
Jaipur, the respondent herein are engaged in manufacture of marble slabs, marble tiles and polished marble tiles falling under heading 2504 of the schedule ... total 1152.613 sq. mtr. of marble slabs, 380.66 sq. mtr. of marble tiles and 1356.73 sq. mtr. of polished marble tiles. Aforesaid excess quantity
clandestine removal of frit by frit manufacturers and cleared to the Ceramic Tiles manufactures:-
S.
No.
Appeal No./ Application Nos.
Appellant
Orders-in-Original Numbers ... certain investigating regarding large scale Central Excise duty evasion by Ceramic/vitrified tile manufactures of Gujarat, located in Morbi and Himmatnagar.
(ii) That
Archean Marbles & Tiles Pvt. Ltd vs Cc, Hyderabad on 23 October, 2017
CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
REGIONAL BENCH AT HYDERABAD
Bench ... Dated 20.06.2016 passed by Commissioner (Appeals), CCCE, Hyderabad)
Archean Marbles & Tiles Pvt. Ltd Appellant (s)
Vs.
CC, Hyderabad Respondent(s)
Appearance
Sri Y. Srinivasa
Chennai Iv vs M/S. Kent Ceramic Tiles & Co. Pvt. Ltd on 27 April, 2015
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ... Excise (Appeals), Chennai)
CCE, Chennai IV Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Kent Ceramic Tiles & Co. Pvt. Ltd. Respondent
Appearance
Shri K.P. Muralidharan
Nitco Tiles Ltd vs Mumbai Iii on 22 June, 2012
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH AT MUMBAI
APPEAL ... Whether Order is to be circulated to the Departmental authorities?
:
Yes
Nitco Tiles Ltd.
Appellant
Vs
Commissioner of Central Excise
Mumbai III
Respondent
Appearance:
Shri
verification of the stock, excess stock of 22435 boxes of Glazed Vitrified Tiles valued at Rs.81,71,500/- as well as shortage were noticed ... finished goods of Glazed vitrified Tiles as recorded in the RG-1 Registrar. On further investigation, it came to the notice of the Department that
Nitco Tiles Ltd vs Commissioner Of Central Excise ... on 18 February, 2015
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH ... circulated to the Departmental: Yes
authorities?
=======================================================
M/s. Nitco Tiles Ltd.
:
Appellants
VS
Commissioner of Central Excise Mumbai-II
:
Respondent
Appearance
Shri. T.C. Nair
Kuitun Jinjiang Chemical Industry Co ... vs Designated Authority Directorate ... on 5 August, 2020
Author: Dilip
