Sri K Dinesh vs Sri Kumaraswany And Others on 30 August, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy
Sri Shivashankara vs Sri H P Vedavyasachar on 9 September, 2010
Author: Aravind Kumar
Bench
18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM
BANGALORE - 18
REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
(AMENDED CAUSE TITEL BY O/D 21.07.2014)
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN
looked into during the merits of the ease anid ihe. Titel
stage Ure plaint cannot be rejected as SOUGHT fhe
submits Chat considering the history
respect to th eC CUSEM (1 their hawk, ve
has speclfically deniea titel suggestion ei
specifically admitted that there. is a aceount of the
accused
petitioner No.2 in the presenVce:VVo*f.titeL'wé.tn'ess_es,i§ Hence,
the complaint was 'took cognizance
ping au a a fed had * 13 'i . Bet eng titel
a Ea ba
pathos
Area,
Be
'Oo Pacer
F
£
OW
97,2
'e
ny
#
%
Titel
entitled for titel
j+. Out of which, a sur -
ifwe deduct
titel Dene