from the date of direct
entry in service i.e. as Traffic Apprentice and before completion
of 10/30 years of service, the applicant will ... dispute arises
because though the applicant joined as a Traffic Apprentice on
18.02.1980, he was appointed on a regular basis on 12.03.1983.
3
OA 4410
briefly stated thus:
The first applicant was appointed as Traffic Apprentice on
29.7.2002 in Madurai Division of Southern Railway on direct
recruitment. He was absorbed ... Senthilkumar and Sanjaykumar applied for direct selection to the post
of Traffic Apprentice in the scale Rs. 5500-9000 in Trivandrum
Division pursuant to employment
controversy related to the scale of pay admissible for Traffic apprentices in the Railway appointed prior to the cut off date. It was observed that ... stand, then the resultant position would have been that some Traffic Apprentices who were parties in those cases would have granted an unfair and understood
selection for lateral induction to the post of SM.II (Traffic Apprentice)
in the scale of Rs. 5500-9000 against 10% LDCE quota which ... applicants were
selected and recommended for being placed for promotion as Traffic
Apprentice (SM.Gr.II) in scale Rs. 5500-9000 against 10% LDCE quota
controversy related to the
scale of pay admissible for Traffic apprentices in the
Railway appointed prior to the cut off date. It was
observed that ... stand, then
the resultant position would have been that some Traffic
Apprentices who were parties in those cases would
have granted an unfair and understood
controversy related to the
scale of pay admissible for Traffic apprentices in the Railway
appointed prior to the cut off date. It was observed that ... stand, then the
resultant position would have been that some Traffic
Apprentices who were parties in those cases would have gained
an unfair and undeserved
controversy related to the
scale of pay admissible for Traffic apprentices in the Railway
appointed prior to the cut off date. It was observed that ... stand, then the
resultant position would have been that some Traffic
Apprentices who were parties in those cases would have gained
an unfair and undeserved
applicant is that applicants husband, was appointed as Traffic Apprentice on 05.06.1956 with the respondents. He died in harness on 10.11.1983 while working
Deputy
Director Establishment (N) Railway Board, which pertains to
Recruitment of Traffic/Commercial Apprentices, it was mentioned as
under:
"In terms of existing rules ... Station Masters, Yard Masters
Traffic Inspectors and Selection Controllers are filled by
recruitment of Commercial and Traffic Apprentices. Out of this,
15% is filled
result for the examination conducted for the post
of Commercial Traffic Apprentice, 2) expenditure incurred on uniform on a Grade pay
employee in a year
