Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 7692 (1.55 seconds)

State Of Uttarakhand vs Sartaj Khan on 7 December, 2017

that includes measures to prevent such trafficking, to punish the traffickers and to protect the victims of such trafficking, including by protecting their internationally recognized ... into action to eradicate human trafficking. 50. Taking note of the Vienna Forum against Trafficking in Persons in the framework of the United 22 Nations
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 59 - Cited by 2 - A Singh - Full Document

Mohammad Riyaz vs The State Of Telangana on 27 June, 2018

exploitation recruits, transports, harbours, transfers or receives a person or persons for the purpose of trafficking, such person is punishable under Section ... consent of any person having control over the person recruited, transported, harboured, transferred or received, commits the offence of trafficking. The word "exploitation
Telangana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 23 - Full Document

Apne Aap Women Worldwide Trust India & ... vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 20 November, 2014

expanding, clarifying the scope of trafficking with specific explanations introducing new Section 370-A dealing with exploitation of trafficked person as also making the same ... Penal Code to book the trafficker in connection with the offence of trafficking, exploitation of the trafficked person by imparting training so as to enable
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 23 - Cited by 1 - V N Sinha - Full Document

Pinki vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 15 April, 2025

specifically in 1950 indicates that at that time, trafficking was confined to certain forms. Trafficking in Persons (for short, “TIP”) in India has taken diverse ... addition to the conventional understanding of trafficking being synonymous to sex trafficking and forced labour, trafficking includes other forms as long as there is “recruitment
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vankayalapati Srinivasa Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 31 October, 2025

Trafficking is concerned, said Report discloses that the Act, 1956, did not define trafficking comprehensively and it further recommended to criminalize employment of trafficked person ... person having control over such person. Therefore, a customer, who is apprehended while engaging in sexual exploitation of a person who is trafficked, cannot
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - K S Reddy - Full Document

Satish Muddana vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 31 October, 2025

Trafficking is concerned, said Report discloses that the Act, 1956, did not define trafficking comprehensively and it further recommended to criminalize employment of trafficked person ... person having control over such person. Therefore, a customer, who is apprehended while engaging in sexual exploitation of a person who is trafficked, cannot
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - K S Reddy - Full Document

Devireddy Siva Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 31 October, 2025

Trafficking is concerned, said Report discloses that the Act, 1956, did not define trafficking comprehensively and it further recommended to criminalize employment of trafficked person ... person having control over such person. Therefore, a customer, who is apprehended while engaging in sexual exploitation of a person who is trafficked, cannot
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - K S Reddy - Full Document

Danda Vema Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 31 October, 2025

Trafficking is concerned, said Report discloses that the Act, 1956, did not define trafficking comprehensively and it further recommended to criminalize employment of trafficked person ... person having control over such person. Therefore, a customer, who is apprehended while engaging in sexual exploitation of a person who is trafficked, cannot
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - K S Reddy - Full Document

Dasari Sri Sai Naveen Dass vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 31 October, 2025

Trafficking is concerned, said Report discloses that the Act, 1956, did not define trafficking comprehensively and it further recommended to criminalize employment of trafficked person ... person having control over such person. Therefore, a customer, who is apprehended while engaging in sexual exploitation of a person who is trafficked, cannot
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 26 - Cited by 0 - K S Reddy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next