Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Counsel further argued that the transcript recorded was in violation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act as no certificate as per the same provision

Singh, Suresh and other persons, and the same is evident from the transcript, Ex. P-2 dated 25.06.2004, brought on the record before the learned ... same is reflected from the transcript, as above mentioned. 5.2.2 That the prosecution has not produced the certificate of correctness, as is mandatory under

that deal with electronic evidence, to ensure their preservation, and production of certificate at the appropriate stage. These directions shall apply in all proceedings, till ... Evidence Act of 1872, of producing a Section 65B certificate along with the said transcript. The only instance under which the same may be circumvented

Counsel further argued that the transcript recorded was in violation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act as no certificate as per the same provision

Counsel further argued that the transcript recorded was in violation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act as no certificate as per the same provision

made a statement that they were not party to the tape recorded transcription. There was no voice test sample taken and the prosecution has miserably ... part of the prosecution that the transcript was not accompanied by a proper certificate under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act and the only

process of law i.e. through the production of the certificate under Section 65 of the Evidence Act, the ownership of the mobile phones, containing ... that of the appellant. 5.5. Learned counsel further submitted that the transcript of verification demand has been created by the constable of his own free

Pannalal vs State on 27 July, 2022 Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati

Prakash Manihar vs State on 25 May, 2022 Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati Bench: Pushpendra Singh

Manohar Lal vs State Of Raj on 9 September, 2022 Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati Bench