prosecution did not submit the certificate u/s 65B of the
Evidence Act but the electronic evidence and transcript
version of the same is admissible ... Meena. As regards
the transcript of conversation it has been admitted by the
learned Public Prosecutor that there is no certificate as
(Downloaded
prosecution did not submit the certificate u/s 65B of the
Evidence Act but the electronic evidence and transcript
version of the same is admissible ... Meena. As regards
the transcript of conversation it has been admitted by the
learned Public Prosecutor that there is no certificate as
(Downloaded
PW16 Narender Kumar, who
has prepared the transcript. He has stated that he has
prepared the transcript as narrated by the Addl.
Superintendent of Police ... also relied upon the recording
and the transcript. As observed above, admittedly no
certificate under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act was
obtained during
Counsel further argued that the transcript
recorded was in violation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act as no
certificate as per the same provision
Counsel further argued that the transcript
recorded was in violation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act as no
certificate as per the same provision
Counsel further argued that the transcript
recorded was in violation of Section 65B of the Evidence Act as no
certificate as per the same provision
recorder containing the
demand of bribe, verification memo of transcript of recorded
conversation, memo transcription of recorded conversation at the
time of bribe transaction ... tape
recorder Ex.P10, verification memo of transcript of recorded
conversation Ex.P11, memo transcription of recorded conversation
at the time of bribe
application on the ground that pen drive
is not supported by a certificate under Section 65-B of the
(Downloaded on 29/06/2019 ... application does not contain detail of the
mobile number from which the transcript was recorded.
3. I have considered the contentions.
4. The present
part of the petitioner the prosecution mainly relies on the transcription of conversations allegedly taken place between the complainant and co-accused and co-accused ... evidence of such telephonic conversations is inadmissible in evidence in absence of certificate as required under Section 65-B of the Evidence
allegation of misconduct is
also not found as there is no telephonic transcript of any demand
or any signature of the accused-petitioner. There ... However, there are procedural errors found
like absence of sales tax clearance certificate etc. The other
officials of the Corporation have been held responsible
