Central Bureau Of Investigation vs K.V.Srinivasa Prasad on 9 December, 2020
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs K.V.Srinivasa Prasad on 9 December, 2020
IN THE
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10876 (3.07 seconds)Lokayukta Police Inspector vs D.S.Kumaraiah on 23 July, 2018
stated that in respect of call
details and CDs and transcriptions, certificate under Section
65B of Indian Evidence Act is not taken. He has stated ... transcriptions at Ex.P.9. In respect of these
transcriptions and CDs, as admitted by P.W.6, no certificate as
required under Section
Dr. Karthik Rao Ajjampur vs B.M.T.C on 5 August, 2024
Medical Council, Ex.P.9 is the copy of the Medical
Transcription certificate, Ex.P.10 is the Provisional
Certificate dated 12.12.2016 issued by Indira ... Certificate of
Registration (original compared and
SCCH-1 19 MVC No.3306/2022
returned)
Ex.P.9 Notarized copy of Training Certificate for
Medical Transcription
State Of Karnataka vs K.Venkatesh on 4 February, 2019
2013
respect of these C.D's and transcriptions no certificate under
section 65B of Indian Evidence Act is obtained. The original
voice recorder ... certificate obtained under section 65B
of Indian Evidence Act, M.O.9, 11 and Ex.P.7 and 8
transcriptions are not admissible
State Of Karnataka vs S.V.Jagannathreddy on 27 October, 2018
respect of these transmitted C.Ds. and
transcriptions also, no Certificate under Section 65B of Indian
Evidence Act is obtained. Original device, like button camera ... Therefore, all
these C.Ds. and its transcriptions produced in this case, which
are not supported by Certificate under Section 65B of Indian
Evidence
State Of Karnataka vs Kenchaiah S/O Late Mallaiah on 31 October, 2018
2013
electronic records. In respect of these transmitted C.Ds. and
transcriptions, no certificate under Section 65B of Indian
Evidence Act is obtained. Original device ... these C.D.s and its transcriptions
produced in this case which are not supported by Certificate
under Section 65B of Indian Evidence
Lokayukta Police Inspector vs Nagaraj Naik on 7 August, 2018
respect of CD and Ex.P.4
transcriptions, there is no certificate under Sec.65-B of Indian
Evidence Act obtained. Even during the trap ... these CD M.O.-10 and Ex.P.6 transcription there
appears to be no certificate obtained under Sec.65-B of Indian
Evidence
Lokayukta Police Inspector vs Sri. K.H. Gopinath on 7 June, 2018
Evidence Act ". Therefore Ex.P.33 transcription is not
admissible in evidence. In respect of transcription of the
alleged recording of the conversation with ... marked on behalf of the defence:
Ex.D.1 : Transcription
Ex.D.2 : Payment certificate
Ex.D.3 : Department evidence
The State Of Karnataka vs D.K. Annegowda on 20 November, 2019
referred to above or the
transcriptions as per Ex.P.2 and 3, the prosecution has not
produced certificate as required under section ... inadmissable.".
Since there is no certificate obtained under section 65B of Indian
Evidence Act, the transcription
State Of Karnataka vs Puttaiah Virakthamath on 9 October, 2018
Certificate under Section 65B of Indian
Evidence Act is obtained in respect of these C.Ds. and
transcriptions. Call details are also secured ... Court. The
C.Ds. and transcriptions are secondary evidence of electronic
records. In the absence of certificate u/s 65B of Indian
Evidence