Acit Cir 7(1)(2), Mumbai vs Laxmi Venture (India) Ltd, Mumbai on 12 March
Trb.) 186
vi) Reliance Gas Transportation Infrastructure Ltd. vs. CIT(2014) (100 DTR
1)(Mum.)(Trb.) and
vii) CIT vs. Anil Kumar Sharma ... Trb.) 1 , order dated 10/1/2014, wherein
one of us (ld. AM) is signatory to the order. In another case from
ACIT Vs Vireet Investment (P) Ltd , (82 taxmann.com 415)
(Delhi-Trb SB), wherein it was held by special bench that computation under
clause
DCIT Vs. Gobind Glass Industries Ltd. 110 Taxman
109(Ahd Trb) (Mag)
13 ITA Nos.2560-2600/Mum/20
M/s.Cox & Kings
Siemens Limited (ITA No.4356/Mum/2010/30 taxmann.com 200)
(Mum Trb.) - Hon'ble Tribunal has held that the word "technical
Signode India Ltd. vs. DCIT, 110
TTJ 170 (Hyd-Trb)
xx xx
21. Per contra, the ld. Departmental Representative vehemently
defending the assessment order submitted
Signode India Ltd. vs. DCIT, 110
TTJ 170 (Hyd-Trb)
xx xx
21. Per contra, the ld. Departmental Representative vehemently
defending the assessment order submitted
Signode India Ltd. vs. DCIT, 110
TTJ 170 (Hyd-Trb)
xx xx
21. Per contra, the ld. Departmental Representative vehemently
defending the assessment order submitted
Reliance Gas
Transportation Infrastructure Ltd. vs. CIT (2014) 100 DTR
(Mum.) (Trb.) 1 , order dated 10/1/2014. In another case
from
Signode India Ltd. vs. DCIT, 110 TTJ 170 (Hyd-Trb)
In respect of ECBs the ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that ECB was raised