through personal
capacity as well as through proprietary concern M/s. Trishul
Developers along-with interest were repaid back in the months of
September ... seized reflects loan
transactions of by M/s Trishul Developers (prop Khimji
Karamshi Patel
letter is from M/s. Trishul Buildtech
Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. (for erstwhile firm Trishul
Developers). Copy of the letter dated 12.08.2011 is
kept on record ... details portion stated
"for M/s. Trishul Buildtech Infrastructures Pvt.
Ltd. (formerly known as Trishul Developers) is kept
on record at assessee
letter is from M/s. Trishul Buildtech
Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. (for erstwhile firm Trishul
Developers). Copy of the letter dated 12.08.2011 is
kept on record ... details portion stated
"for M/s. Trishul Buildtech Infrastructures Pvt.
Ltd. (formerly known as Trishul Developers) is kept
on record at assessee
letter is from M/s. Trishul Buildtech
Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd. (for erstwhile firm Trishul
Developers). Copy of the letter dated 12.08.2011 is
kept on record ... details portion stated
"for M/s. Trishul Buildtech Infrastructures Pvt.
Ltd. (formerly known as Trishul Developers) is kept
on record at assessee
order?
(2) Whether the appellant M/s Trishul Buildtech Infrastructure
(P) Ltd (erstwhile firm Trishul Developers) has any locus standi
to file the present appeal ... Trishul Developers now M/s Trishul
Buildtech Infrastructure Pvt Ltd instead of mentioning only "M/s
Trishul Developers" in the notices issued
Prerna Pai & 4 Ors. vs M/S. Trishul Developers & 4 Ors. on 12 October, 2022
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI CONSUMER ... BALJEET SINGH . 10. KULPREET BHUI . ...........Complainant(s) Versus 1. M/S. TRISHUL DEVELOPERS & 4 ORS. Through Its Partners Mittal Towers, Office
factual position in
the present case is that the conversion of Trishul
Developers the partnership firm as as limited company
by name TBIPL took place ... only Trishul
Developers will have to be assessed. The provisions of
s.170(2) cannot be involved for the simple reason that
the erstwhile firm
factual position in
the present case is that the conversion of Trishul
Developers the partnership firm as as limited company
by name TBIPL took place ... only Trishul
Developers will have to be assessed. The provisions of
s.170(2) cannot be involved for the simple reason that
the erstwhile firm
advertising agency, involved in advertising activity exclusively in the print
media. Trishul Communications [Trishul - in short] also located in the same
premises was doing similar ... exclusively in the print media. Its sister concern - Trishul - also in
the same line of business. Trishul was an accredited advertising agency
as recognized
M/S. Corporate Leisure & Property ... vs Dcit, Central Circle-2(1)(1), ... on 27
