Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 36 (0.04 seconds)

Hind Motors vs Pawan Kumar on 3 December, 2012

estimate of Rs.83000/- for repairs, citing that the vehicle required engine overhaul, turbo charger, and lathe job. It was stated that the Opposite Parties ... same, after examining it, reported that the vehicle required engine overhaul, Turbo charger and Lathe job. The estimate of repairs was given by the Service
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Geeta Gupta vs Sahara India Pariwar on 15 May, 2012

appeared that lot of dust had entered in the turbo of the engine during a short span. Moreover, the vehicle was used by the complainant ... complainant to the Service Station on 24.07.2007 and the turbo charger of the engine was repaired on 30.07.2007. Again the car started creating trouble
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri Krishan Kumar vs Sikand And Co. on 26 June, 2012

that that there was no defect in the engine. Defect was stated to be in Turbo Charger and other parts and the warranty card specifically ... provided that in case the engine did not work satisfactorily because of some defect in Turbo Charger or other named parts of the vehicle, then
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next